smartphone manufacturers, “preserving battery life” We witness that it restricts the performance of applications or directly the system. Although some companies leave it to the people’s choice, some do it without the knowledge of their users, and this situation causes great reactions when it is understood in some way.
According to the news of Android Authority, Samsung phones have system apps, pre-installed Google apps and apps downloaded by users. performance limitation has been detected. While reactions continue on Samsung’s community forums and social media; applications that were subject to restrictions also appeared.
New information has come from Samsung’s affordable models!
The designs of the Samsung Galaxy A13 and Galaxy A33 5G models, which are expected to be introduced very soon, have been announced. Here are the details…
Samsung restricts 10,000 apps
According to a Twitter user’s post, the performance throttling the number of applications is 10 thousand. on this list YouTube, Instagram, Netflix, Microsoft Office, TikTok In addition to applications used by almost everyone, such as Samsung’s Secure Folder, Samsung Pay, Samsung Pass services are also included.
“So what’s the reason for that?” If you’re thinking, the answer is simple: Samsung phones have software called Game Optimization Service (GOS). As the name suggests, the main purpose of this software is to play games on the phone. prevent overheating, stuttering and preserve battery life.
However, for an unknown reason, the Game Optimization Service (GOS) affects not only games but also applications. This causes the performance of applications such as Instagram and YouTube to decrease. Users who detected the problem, even if the phone temperature is at a reasonable level They also point out that GOS comes into play.
3DMark, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench 5 benchmarking applications such as the Game Optimization Service are exempted, that is, performance is not limited in any way.
According to the information shared by Android Authority, Samsung began to investigate the problem. An official statement is expected from the company on the subject.
What do you guys think about this? You can share your views in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.