Opinions also differed on how to deal with Ukraine’s application for quick EU accession. Here, too, Chancellor Scholz was on the side of those who braked. After a long night at the summit, the first cracks appeared in the bloc of states that had previously acted as one.
Scholz was under pressure mainly because of his refusal to stop imports of oil, gas and coal from Russia. “I am convinced that we should take the decision to stop energy imports from Russia in order to bring (Russian President Vladimir) Putin to the negotiating table and end the war,” said Latvian Prime Minister Krisjanis Karins. The President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, stressed the need to send a clear message and restrict Russian exports.
Both sided with countries like Poland and Lithuania, which had already spoken out in favor of such a step. This is intended to deprive the Russian state of its main source of income for financing the war against Ukraine.
Top jobs of the day
Find the best jobs now and
be notified by email.
According to estimates by the Brussels think tank Bruegel, the EU countries currently spend around 420 million dollars (380 million euros) on Russian gas and almost 400 million dollars (362 million euros) on oil from Russia. This is mainly due to the fact that countries such as Germany, Austria and Hungary cover a large part of their energy requirements with supplies from Russia.
Support for Scholz from Austria
Scholz said on Monday: “There is currently no other way to secure Europe’s energy supply for heat generation, mobility, power supply and industry.” In Versailles, he said that the sanctions should be considered very precisely, how how to convince the Russian government to end the war. At the same time, it is important to ensure that the effects in Europe are as small as possible. “We should continue to pursue this course.”
Scholz received support from Austria’s Chancellor Karl Nehammer. “Austria cannot now say that we are doing without Russian natural gas, we need it,” said the conservative politician on Friday night after the first day of the summit. In the summit statement published early Friday morning, it was finally said in general that one was ready to act quickly with further sanctions.
Tensions were also evident at the summit over the question of how to deal with Ukraine’s desire for quick accession to the EU. The Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte gave the request a clear rejection. “There is no such thing as accelerated accession,” he said.
His Luxembourg colleague, Xavier Bettel, said he was not a rule freak, but that there were conditions for joining the EU. Chancellor Scholz made a similar statement. “It is very important that we continue to pursue the things that we have decided in the past,” he said.
After the first day of the summit, Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa said that opinion was divided. The majority see that Ukraine is at war and people are fighting for their lives, others are still debating the procedure.
On the night of Friday, the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy even spoke of the “final test for Europe” with regard to the accession question. He believes “that our people, our state, our army have already done everything to see us there among equals, to invite us there,” he said in a video message.
However, no concrete commitments were made to Ukraine in the final declaration. Instead, it just says that Ukraine belongs to the European family. At the same time, countries such as Estonia and Lithuania had urged that Kyiv should be made more accommodating.
Dealing with the economic consequences of the war is also an issue
Instead, the Ukrainian armed forces could get more weapons and equipment from the EU. According to EU Council President Charles Michel, Foreign Affairs Commissioner Josep Borrell proposed to the heads of state and government at the summit to mobilize 500 million euros for additional supplies. A first package of 500 million euros had already been approved at the end of February.
Another hot topic at the two-day summit is how to deal with the effects of the war on economic development in the EU. France, for example, brought up the idea of adopting a debt-financed support program, as it did during the corona crisis. This could therefore help to cushion the consequences of the current increase in energy prices, but also promote investments in defense projects. Countries like Germany and the Netherlands do not consider this necessary at the moment and point out that the 800 billion euro Corona aid package should first be used up.
Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, on the other hand, was open to the French proposal. “Italy and France are also completely aligned on this front,” Draghi said.
EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced at the summit that she intended to propose a temporary cap on energy prices. It is therefore a question of limiting the “contagion effects” between gas prices and electricity prices.
More: Europe in the energy crisis: EU Commission considers electricity price cap