Some Court Decisions That Will Help You in Your Daily Life

When you learn about some of the higher court decisions that are not known to everyone but will be useful to us, you can knock on the court doors and hold on to your phones. You can call your lawyer.

In addition to resources while preparing the content From Lawyer Yıldırım Hacıoğlu Let’s enter the unknown world of law by stating that we received support from .

“Exchange, no refund” written on Instagram boutique pages. Similar statements are unlawful. In accordance with Article 48/4 of the TKHK, the consumer can return the product he purchased online within 14 days without giving any reason.

The bank is responsible for the loss of the person whose money is withdrawn from the bank through internet fraud.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 11th Civil Chamber
• Master: 2017/4888
• Decision: 20219/2015

If the product purchased online with a credit card is not delivered to the customer; The bank must issue a refund to the customer’s card.

• 19th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals
• Basis: 2016/1953
• Decision: 2017/2895

The message sent as “Hahaha, idiot” constitutes the crime of insult, as it will offend the honor, dignity and respect of the addressee.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 4th Criminal Chamber
• Base: 2020/20273
• Decision: 2020/13343

Of course, for this to be considered a crime of insult, the content of the message must be insincere must be. The front and back of the message are looked at. So, you cannot cause your friend to be punished just because he called you “idiot”.

A person whose vehicle is damaged as a result of a traffic accident can claim the vehicle deprivation fee even if he has not rented a replacement vehicle or has not submitted a document proving that he has rented a vehicle.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 4th Civil Chamber
• Base: 2021/26777
• Decision: 2022/11236

In case the purchased vehicle turns out to be stolen, the notary who does not take the necessary care in examining the fake documents presented to him/her is also responsible for compensating the damage.

• Supreme Court of Appeals General Assembly
• Basis: 2007/1527
• Decision: 2007/14638

“U-turn cannot be made.” The provisions of conscious negligence are applied to the defendant who turns despite the sign and causes the accident.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 12th Criminal Chamber
• Base: 2019/6650
• Decision: 2020/4485

A driver who closely follows a vehicle in traffic, corners it, or harasses it by using flashlights is punished with up to 1 year in prison.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 12th Criminal Chamber
• Master: 2011/5602
• Decision: 2011/3661

The spouse who prevents the woman’s right to education is completely at fault in the divorce case.

• 18th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals
• Basis: 2020/4728
• Decision: 2020/5981

If a married person states on the internet that he is single, it is grounds for divorce.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber
• Master: 2013/26881
• Decision: 2014/10367

The installment amounts paid after the marriage date of the house purchased with a mortgage loan before marriage are considered acquired property. In case of divorce, property is subject to division.

• 8th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals
• Base: 2017/8450
• Decision: 2019/1633

The spouse who violates the moral independence of the house by giving the keys to the shared residence to his family is seriously at fault in the divorce case.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber
• Base: 2020/2101
• Decision: 2020/3085

The accident caused by a worker falling from the stairs at work is a work accident. The fact that the worker wears high heels does not change the fact that there is a work accident.

• Supreme Court of Appeals General Assembly
• Basis: 2016/1912
• Decision: 2019/1235

If you work even for 10 minutes during the week break, the employer must pay 1.5 days’ wages.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 9th Civil Chamber
• Base: 2016/6143
• Decision: 2019/18054

Fingerprints cannot be taken for shift control unless the worker agrees.

• Council of State 5th Chamber
• Base: 2013/5342
• Decision: 2013/9525

The provisions on the pages of the employment contract that are not signed by the employee are not binding on the employee.

• 22nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals
• Master: 2015/6404
• Decision: 2016/3813

The administration is responsible for any malfunctions that occur in the citizen’s vehicle due to the sewer cover remaining open.

• 17th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals
• Master: 2018/4210
• Decision: 2020/4644

The upstairs neighbor, whose balcony and bathroom leak water to his downstairs neighbor but does not have it repaired, must pay compensation to his downstairs neighbor and have the leaking areas repaired.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber
• Basis: 2019/1851
• Decision: 2020/581

Subscribing to electricity and water utilities by signing on behalf of the homeowner constitutes the crime of forgery of private documents.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 11th Civil Chamber
• Base: 2016/11975
• Decision: 2018/4841

The landlord cannot cut off the tenant’s water due to rent receivable. Cutting it off requires paying non-pecuniary damages.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 4th Civil Chamber
• Basis: 2014/5018
• Decision: 2015/1060

The tenant’s claim that he gave the eviction commitment blank (signature in white) and that it was filled in later will not be heard; by signing the document, he is deemed to have accepted in advance how the blank part will be filled.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 6th Civil Chamber
• Master: 2009/12238
• Decision: 2010/2452

In cases where the doctor violates his responsibility for diagnosis and follow-up when the baby is born with Down syndrome, compensation liability arises.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 3rd Civil Chamber
• Base: 2020/7340
• Decision: 2020/6970

If a burn occurs as a result of the laser operation, non-pecuniary compensation is awarded in favor of the victim.

• Supreme Court of Appeals 3rd Civil Chamber
• Base: 2014/19681
• Decision: 2015/15751

Even if it’s the law last wordLet us also note what the Supreme Court and other higher courts said.

If there are Supreme Court decisions that you have learned through experience, to the comments we are waiting.

Our other content on the subject that may attract your attention: