OnlyFans Allegedly Bribing Meta

OnlyFans, one of the biggest discussion topics of today, came up with a very striking claim today. OnlyFans has sought to outdo its competitors in the adult content industry in multiple lawsuits filed in the United States. He was accused of bribing Meta employees.

According to the accusations, OnlyFans was adding adult content stars who are not its own users to its ‘terrorist’ list via Meta. Due to this action allegedly made in 2018, some stars using OnlyFans competitor platforms said that their Instagram accounts ‘contains terrorist content’ He saw his entire business and income falling.

They’re flagged on all social media platforms, not just Instagram:

• Kelly Pierce, one of the names alleged to have been added to the terror list

However, users weren’t just flagged as such on Instagram or Facebook. In return for the alleged bribe, Meta employees have been informed that these accounts have terrorist content. Founded in partnership with Microsoft, Twitter, Google and YouTube He also presented at the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism.

Accounts of the stars with the addition of this information to the common platform not just on Instagram, it was flagged on all other platforms. With the marking, the content in the account was subject to shadow ban without the user’s knowledge, so that it would not be shown to almost any user.

It was alleged that there was at least one senior executive among the employees who received bribes:

In some of the cases, there were also some allegations about how the bribery traffic in question took place. According to one of these allegations, the bribery was committed by Fenix ​​International, the parent company of OnlyFans. via a secret Hong Kong subsidiary Opened by Meta employees to offshore bank accounts was being transmitted. Among those who took bribes, there was ‘at least’ one senior manager.

Statement from OnlyFans, the Global Internet Forum for Meta and Counter-Terrorism:

Responding to the BBC upon the allegations in question, the three companies used the following statements:

• OnlyFans: “We know that these lawsuits have been filed. We are not aware of any evidence to support these claims. The alleged participants have publicly declared that these cases have no basis.”
• Meta: “These allegations are baseless and we will consider them in the context of litigation when necessary.”
• Global Internet Forum to Fight Terrorism (GIFCT): “Our ongoing work to improve transparency and oversight of the GIFCT hash share database is the result of extensive interaction with our stakeholders and has no bearing on these claims.”