The artificial intelligence debate, which we have been encountering frequently in recent days, is growing. Finally ChatGPT After being removed from some schools in America, artists also midjourney He thinks that artificial intelligence such as artificial intelligence is a threat to their business and stealing content without paying royalties. For this reason, many artists have sued companies including Midjourney. Here are the details…
Many companies, including Midjourney, are facing class action!
Stability AI and midjourney In artificial intelligence art creation tools, such as artificial intelligence, the algorithm created to obtain new images uses huge databases of human hands. The owners of these databases are often artists. The problem with the class action lawsuit against Midjourney, Stability AI, and DeviantArt is largely that companies don’t pay anything for copyrighted images they use to train AI.
In other words, without the works of artists, such artificial intelligences will not be able to be trained and will not be able to do their job. In addition, these works are subject to copyright. by artists compensation must be paid. The outcome of the case is not yet clear, and these days when artificial intelligence is frequently on the agenda. peer may constitute a decision.
Google’s competitor to Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence!
Google’s DreamFusion project has become the latest artificial intelligence to turn text into images. It will rival DALL-E and Midjourney.
On the other hand, the companies sued argue that the images produced by artificial intelligence are completely legal. Joseph Saveri, the law firm representing the artists, made the following statement on the subject:
Other AI image products such as ”Stable Diffusion and Midjourney; they could not exist without painters, photographers, sculptors and other artists. The owners of this artificial intelligence have violated the rights of at least thousands of artists while producing their various products. Although they claim that the use of these images is perfectly legal, no court has yet addressed the issue.”
Finally, the stock photography service company Shutterstock, Chat-GPT and DALL-E announced that they will create a joint art artificial intelligence tool by making an agreement with OpenAI, the owner of artificial intelligence such as. But here the situation is different. So much so that this artificial intelligence will allow its users to produce artificial intelligence images as they want. But Shutterstock offers both artificial intelligence to artists. trainings as well as the creation of images contributions will pay for it.
We are just at the beginning of the legal process of artificial intelligences such as Midjourney and ChatGPT. The increasing number of artificial intelligence and the advancement of technology mean many new cases and issues on the legal side. So what do you think about this news? Do you think the artists are right in their lawsuit against Midjourney and other companies? Do not forget to share your views with us in the Comments section.