Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol unshETH has lost $375,000 due to a hack. After that, the altcoin project team is holding a meeting with the hackers to return 90% of the stolen funds. Most DeFi attacks happen because of smart contract vulnerabilities. However, unshETH lost funds due to the private key being compromised.
The team of the hacked altcoin project is negotiating with the hackers!
cryptocoin.comAs you follow, on-chain staking platform unshETH has faced an attack. In this attack, hackers managed to steal $375,000 from the protocol. Now, the altcoin project team is negotiating with hackers to return 90% of it. In the latest development, the team wrote a message to the attackers. unshETH has given a deadline of June 3 for the funds to be returned. He then issued the following warning:
We want to be clear, and it’s not a bluff. We know who you and some people (friends) connected to you are. If you do not return the money by the deadline above, we will definitely proceed with law enforcement.
Over the weekend, Jimbos Protocol, another DeFi altcoin project, lost $7.5 million due to the DeFi hack. Like UnshETH, Jimbos tries to recover 90% of its funds while allowing hackers to keep 10% as rewards. On Wednesday, it opened a rewards program for community members who can track down hackers and get funds back. Meanwhile, DeFi protocols lost more than $19.69 million in exploits in May.
Interesting community reaction to the altcoin project: Bluff!
The warning message received a negative reaction from the community. One Twitter user said the warning was “just as a bluff would say.” unshETH has also come under criticism for targeting friends of hackers in its tweet. Community member Haym Salomon says “openly threatening a hacker’s friends is a bar you (probably) wouldn’t want to cross.”
DeFi protocolü How was it hacked?
Attackers seized the private keys of the unshETH protocol on Thursday. After that, hackers siphoned $375,000 worth of crypto from farm rewards and protocol liquidity. However, community members requested details on how the keys were obtained. One Twitter user “alec” accused unshETH of accidentally publishing private keys on GitHub.
Contact us to be instantly informed about the last minute developments. twitter‘in, Facebookin and InstagramFollow and Telegram And YouTube join our channel!
Risk Disclosure: The articles and articles on Kriptokoin.com do not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are high-risk assets, and you should do your due diligence and do your own research before investing in these currencies. You can lose some or all of your money by investing in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Remember that your transfers and transactions are at your own risk and any losses that may occur are your responsibility. Cryptokoin.com does not recommend buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is Kriptokoin.com an investment advisor. For this reason, Kriptokoin.com and the authors of the articles on the site cannot be held responsible for your investment decisions. Readers should do their own research before taking any action regarding the company, assets or services in this article.
Disclaimer: Advertisements on Kriptokoin.com are carried out through third-party advertising channels. In addition, Kriptokoin.com also includes sponsored articles and press releases on its site. For this reason, advertising links directed from Kriptokoin.com are on the site completely independent of Kriptokoin.com’s approval, and visits and pop-ups directed by advertising links are the responsibility of the user. The advertisements on Kriptokoin.com and the pages directed by the links in the sponsored articles do not bind Kriptokoin.com in any way.
Warning: Citing the news content of Kriptokoin.com and quoting by giving a link is subject to the permission of Kriptokoin.com. No content on the site can be copied, reproduced or published on any platform without permission. Legal action will be taken against those who use the code, design, text, graphics and all other content of Kriptokoin.com in violation of intellectual property law and relevant legislation.