10 Interesting Trademark Cases That Surprised Even Judges

Being a big brand naturally means being very visible. This situation leaves no chance for big brands, which are constantly in the spotlight, to make mistakes. However, whether it is their fault or not, being in front of millions of people can sometimes be a shame for brands. with interesting cases It can cause confrontation.

It is of course possible to encounter interesting and absurd claims in the legal arena. In fact, when it comes to brands, it is perhaps inevitable. But there are some cases that are real to those who see them. “no way” It makes you say.

The question of whether a Kit Kat is a chocolate bar or a wafer was answered in a courtroom.

Taxes on chocolates are higher than taxes on wafers. higher Nestle claimed that KitKat was a wafer because it was a wafer and took this situation to court.

In the case held in India in 1999, KitKat A wafer covered with chocolate and the court said, “Although all chocolates contain cocoa, not every product containing cocoa can be classified as chocolate.” in favor of nestle He had decided.

Although Pringles tried to make a move like KitKat, it could not achieve the same success.

Pringles is actually a type of chips, not a type of chips, as it is a type of chips made by thinly cutting a mixture of potato and flour. He claimed it was a cake.

In the case concluded in 2009, the British court ruled against Pringles and declared it a company of Pringles. He concluded that it was chips. And because of this decision, Pringles had a tax debt of $ 160 million.

Subway was sued because its sandwiches were smaller than they should have been.

In 2013, a group of Subway customers came together to order Subway’s sandwiches, which were supposed to be 30 cm. smaller than 30cm He stated that it was and sued the brand.

This is the judge considered the claim weak and cleared Subway of charges of misleading marketing activities. As a result of the lawsuit, Subway agreed to cover the plaintiffs’ expenses and pay $5,000 to all plaintiffs.

Nike was sued for failing to warn customers that its shoes could be used as a dangerous weapon.

In 2013, it was filed by a criminal convicted of trafficking in women and 100 million dollars In the lawsuit demanding compensation, Nike was accused of not having a warning that Air Jordan shoes could not be used as a dangerous weapon.

The reason for this accusation is that the plaintiff attacked a customer who escaped from the hotel without paying, and that person Literally crushes his face with his shoe…

In this case, in which the plaintiff was self-represented, Nike’s lawyers spoke for only 90 seconds and the case was, as you might expect, in favor of Nike It was concluded.

Starbucks was facing a lawsuit worth $5 million for putting too much ice in its drinks.

In the class action lawsuit filed in America in 2016; The brand was accused of Starbucks drinks containing less liquid and more ice than claimed, but the lawsuit was filed against the brand. in favor of Starbucks It was concluded.

McDonald’s was sued for providing too few napkins.

In 2014, McDonald’s was sued by Webster Lucas for only providing a napkin with the order. $1.5 million He was sued for compensation.

Stating that he was emotionally damaged and unable to work due to this situation, Lucas went to various fast-food chains. that he regularly files such lawsuits After it was revealed, McDonald’s emerged as the winning party in this case.

Google was sued by a user who had a traffic accident due to incorrect directions.

In 2011, a user who took Google’s directions too seriously walked onto the highway and made the walk his own. hit by car It was concluded.

Although he filed a lawsuit against both Google and the driver of the car that hit him after the accident, the court Got Google right and had the charges dropped.

Uber was sued by a user for “destroying my marriage”.

The accusation against Uber, which was sued for $45 million in compensation in 2017, was that marital problems After he started using Uber…

The man who logged in to Uber from his wife’s phone was later shut down due to an error in the application. Location information will be sent to your spouse’s phone as a notification He stated that he started having problems in his marriage because of this and that his wife was cheating on him and filed for divorce, claiming that this situation destroyed his marriage and sued the brand.

A consumer, who claimed that he could not pick up beautiful women like in Bud Light commercials, sued the brand for this reason.

Richard Overtun claimed that when he drank Bud Light, he was only drunk and that he could not pick up beautiful women by drinking Bud Light, as shown in commercials. suffered emotional harm and financial loss He sued the brand in 1993, demanding $10,000 in compensation.

You guessed it the case in favor of the brand concluded…

Universal Studios was sued because the horror house was too scary.

Cleanthi Peters, who visited Universal Studios’ annual Halloween horror night with her grandson, was very scared during the tour when a man with a chainsaw in his hand frightened her, and while she was running to the exit, she stepped on a puddle on the ground and ran. was injured.

Peters, who sued Universal Studios for emotional and physical damage as a result of this incident, demanded $15,000 in compensation. This event, It ended in favor of Peters.

Yes, in this content, we have listed interesting cases in which some big brands are a party. Which one did you find most interesting?

Our similar content about brands: