Effective Choice Tactics Applied to Our Subconscious

As we left the 14 May election behind, we wanted to talk about some of the “tactics” that political parties use on voters. We don’t even know about many of them; maybe we can support one party more than the others thanks to the facts they encode in our subconscious!

In fact, when supporting a political party, people look to see if the party’s promises match with them and their ideal country. Especially In this election process, which is also very important for our country, It is based on various election campaigns that the parties gain our sympathy and collect votes.

Strive to cover the missing points of the country, move forward and listen to the wishes of the electorate undoubtedly the most crucial point for all policies. Now let’s move on to these election campaigns and the effects they left on us without us noticing.

We live in a world where women now earn.

in the Department of Urbanism and Planning at MIT Professor Albert Saiz, It examines the results of local elections in Spain, which 10 years ago made it mandatory for women to be included in the lists of parties in the municipal elections by 40%. He also identifies three possibilities on not including women: Voters prefer male candidates, parties have difficulty in finding female candidates with sufficient qualifications, and women are pushed aside.

In the examples in Spain, the law After its entry into force in 2007 In the elections held, parties with female candidates received 4.2% more votes at the ballot boxes. As you can see, the situation has nothing to do with the first two items.

Creating hope for the future is a very important step.

bush and clinton

There is a lot of research on the role played by the economy in elections. The economy, which has become a major problem in our country, is among the issues that most concern the voters. For example, US Presidential Candidate Bill Clinton in 1992used in the election campaign ofIt is the economy stupidThe campaign rhetoric shaped by the slogan ” (this economy is stupid) is undeniable in the election won against George Bush.

The effect of the economy on the ballot box is not with the rhetoric that the government cannot manage the economy well; It is effective to the extent that opposition parties create positive changes in people’s lives. This was exactly the case with the Bill Clinton campaign. The slogans used in the campaign on “health policy” or “change” served this purpose.

Concentrating on the crucial issues that voters care about pays off.


source site-33