new York Nate Anderson took his time. Almost a week passed before the founder of the New York analysis house Hindenburg Research personally commented on Twitter about the latest storm that his latest report had unleashed.
“Interesting,” Anderson tweeted. “Hours after Adani labeled our Hindenburg Research report an ‘attack on India,’ we see hundreds of pro-Adani messages – all with slightly different content, but all with the same unique misspelling.”
In fact, hundreds of users on the Internet had allegedly campaigned independently for Gautam Adani, the richest man in India, whom Hindenburg accused of a gigantic fraud, an inflating of his company conglomerate. The piquant detail: All alleged Adani defenders tweeted almost in the same wording that Adani was doing great things for the Indian “Natioin”, typos included. Anderson sensed nothing behind it other than paid bots.
Read on now
Get access to this and every other article in the
Web and in our app free of charge for 4 weeks.
Further
Read on now
Get access to this and every other article in the
Web and in our app free of charge for 4 weeks.
Further