of Samsung It was stated that the advertisements he made for the smartphone model were misleading. In the latest case in Australia, some of Samsung’s phones were allegedly not water resistant expressed. Thereupon the company $9.8 million money penalty cut off.
Samsung to pay $9.8 million for water-resistance ads
As part of the latest lawsuit in Australia, Samsung was fined. tech giant Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 It turned out that the models used misleading statements in their water-resistance advertisements. According to the Australian judge’s decision, thousands of customers were harmed by these ads.
It was stated that seven Samsung Galaxy models, which were introduced to the market between 2016 and 2018, fell short in terms of water resistance. Samsung advertises phones can be charged even when wet was claiming. However, it turned out that the devices do not have such a capability.
Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra!
We compared the cameras of the two flagship models of Android, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra and the Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Samsung’s total of Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 models in Australia 3.1 million units sold expressed. Although it is not known how many of these devices were damaged, it was reported that hundreds of customers were damaged.
“Samsung’s water-resistance claims were a major selling point for Galaxy phones,” said Gina Cass-Gottlieb, Chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. “Consumers may have been exposed to misleading advertisements before purchasing a new phone.”
Agreeing to pay $ 9.8 million under the lawsuit, Samsung also $200,000 investigation. cost of also have to meet. It should be noted that the South Korean company has not yet made a statement regarding the case.
So what do you think about Samsung’s misleading advertising claims? You can share your views with us in the comments section.