Is It Legal to Take a Photograph of a Random Person on the Street?

especially on social media street photography You’ve probably seen people who do it take glamorous photos of random people. This trend, which is very popular abroad, especially among photographers, sometimes fails to create the expected effect, and people by reacting results.

In fact, when many people see their unannounced photos on social media, they go directly to the photographer and take the photo. to remove can ask. Going beyond that legal means There are also those who say that they will apply. So, is there a legal basis for this or can these people have their photos removed by using these methods?

Basically no.

In society; i.e. on the street, in the park, in the square, etc. taking pictures of people in different places does not constitute a crime and not against the law. If a random photo of someone is taken and posted on social media, there is a reason for those on social media to see it. if you don’t mindthis situation is not against the law as it will not violate confidentiality.

So a person you will see in the square on social media Since people can come and see, only the intervening of the camera and the social media platforms in question wouldn’t change anything.

Therefore, it is not possible to ask for compensation.

ionvisuals

But the images in question humiliating Of course, if it has the potential to cause different situations that affect people badly, it can of course be classified as a crime. On top of that, there are annoying things like constantly taking a picture of a certain person and following him. In such scenarios, whether or not the photo is taken in public get rid of easily does not provide.

Given what we’ve said so far…

photographer’s photo not deleteSince his actions such as not giving a copy of the photo, not stopping to take the photo, will not constitute a crime. judiciary it does not create a situation: In public places, the camera can also capture what the eye sees.

But there is also a scenario where this is a crime.

Seb Agresti

“Yes, taking and disseminating photos of people is a crimeIn the scenario we say, the law on privacy and protection of personal data has been violated. People’s home, non-public changing rooms, washrooms, etc. Photos taken in places violate the privacy of private life. These are inappropriate photos taken in public. criminal. In this regard, we can look at the following articles in the TCK.

ARTICLE 134- (1) Anyone who violates the privacy of individuals’ private life is punished with imprisonment from one year to three years. your privacy recording images or sounds In the event of a violation, the penalty to be imposed is increased by one fold. (one)

(2) (Amended: 2/7/2012-6352/Art.81) Regarding the private life of individuals images or sounds Anyone who discloses illegally is punished with imprisonment from two to five years. If these disclosed data are published through the press and broadcast, the same penalty will be imposed.

In conclusion, let’s gather what we have said in one denominator.

faungg’s photos/Flickr

violating privacy Obtaining images and sound recordings is a crime, and disseminating them is also a crime. Even for married couples, unannounced recording with hidden cameras placed in the house to measure fidelity can be counted as a reason for divorce. In other words, whether the images or sound recordings are taken in public areas as long as the privacy of private life is violated. it doesn’t matter. Any crime.

On the other hand, if any personal data is not disclosed or unless there is a violation of the lawTaking photos or disseminating these photos does not constitute a crime. For this reason, the photographer cannot be asked to remove a perfectly standard, normal photograph.