EdirneIn , a woman installed spyware on her husband’s phone. In this context, he presented the evidence obtained in court in the divorce case. Here, his wife claimed that her personal data was seized and used, and a criminal investigation was started against the woman. SputnikAccording to the news of Constitutional Court He stated that the criminal investigation against the woman was not carried out effectively and went for a retrial.
The decision was made for the YouTuber who climbed on the metrobus!
The decision made by the court for the YouTuber, who went on the Metrobus and passed through the 15 July Bridge, has been determined.
Koca emphasized that personal information was seized
The spouse emphasized that all personal data, e-government password, bank account information, social media correspondence, call records, GPS location records, photos and videos were seized in violation of the rights of privacy and protection of personal data.
on appeal District Court of Justicehusband who could not get positive results from BY Constitutional CourtHe made an individual application to Supreme Court At the end of the review, he made the following evaluations:
“It is clear that the approach of the courts of rank, which will result in the lack of private life space between the spouses, is contrary to the constitutional guarantees. As a result, it was concluded that the right to demand the protection of personal data within the scope of the right to respect for private life regulated in Article 20 of the Constitution was violated, since the conditions required by the positive obligation to be undertaken by the public authorities in establishing an effective judicial system were not fulfilled in the concrete case. It has been decided that the right to request the protection of personal data within the scope of the right to respect for private life has been violated, since the fundamental allegations regarding the clarification of the incident were not investigated by the court, the examination was not deepened, and the conclusion was reached with reasons that do not fit the concrete case. Accordingly, it is understood that the violation resulted from the actions of the court. The appellate authority did not remedy the violation either.”
Constitutional Court As a result of all the considerations, he finally made a judgment. He made the following statements:
“The right to demand the protection of personal data breach that the allegation that the respect for privacy It was unanimously decided that a copy of the decision should be sent to the court for a retrial in order to eliminate the consequences of the violation of the right to request the protection of personal data.
You to your wife’s phone spyware What do you think about the situation as a result of the download? Don’t forget to mention your ideas in the comments section!