Gossiping, Grounds for Fire Without Compensation

The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that a staff member dismissed for gossiping cannot receive severance and notice pay. The precedent-setting decision concerns all employees.

9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals, which actually concerns all employees, exemplary signed a decision. In line with the decision taken, colleagues in the workplace the gossiping staff, was ordered to be fired without compensation. Let’s take a closer look at this important decision that will make you think twice when speaking at your workplace.

A citizen, who claimed that he could not get his rights from the place where he was fired as a night watchman, appealed to the court. From your employer severance and notice pay The citizen who demanded overtime wages lost this case. As a result of its examination, the 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that the plaintiff’s party only overtime pay He decided he could have it. Because, according to lawyers, gossip was a reason for dismissal without compensation.

The employer warned many times!

The court also consulted the employer’s statement. The employer claims that the employee in question is gossiping about other personnel and pitting employees against each other defended. Arguing that the employee did not do his job in line with the principle of truth and honesty and that he received verbal warnings many times for this reason, the employer claimed that the employee’s behavior Because there is no improvement He also stated that he fired him. The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found the employer right in this matter.

RELATED NEWS

Much Discussed Decision from the Supreme Court: Using a Work Phone Without Permission Was Considered a Ground for Fire Without Compensation –

Within the scope of the precedent decision, the following statements were made: In the concrete case; In the petition, an overtime fee of 2 thousand TL was requested, with the rights regarding overtime reserved. Although the overtime fee requested in the petition was ruled, accepting the amount calculated in the additional expert report as overtime fee without making an appropriate discount and making the decision without reserving the rights regarding the overtime was inappropriate and required reversal.

Source :
https://www.ntv.com.tr/ntvpara/dedikodu-yapan-isci-tazminatsiz-kovulaçık,8QE6XZXliEOz6SIXlbPHTw


source site-36