Google’s Artificial Intelligence Developing ‘For All’ Policies

The debate about artificial intelligence replacing the governments of countries has been going on for a long time in the world. Artificial intelligence to humans how ‘equal’ it will behave and how ‘ethical’ it will be While the subject was a big discussion area, a special news came from Google’s artificial intelligence initiative DeepMind recently.

Google’s DeepMind team has managed to train an AI system to come up with a ‘one size fits all’ policy for distributing public funds in an online game. In the education of artificial intelligence In an online game played by 4 people 4000 real people and computer simulations were used.

AI has developed a common policy that does not comply with either of the two accepted policies:

In the game in question, players start the game with different amounts of money and a public fund pool is used to help grow. how much they will contribute they decide. In the end, they get a share back for their contribution. Players also voted for their favorite policies to distribute public money.

Analyzing this game for education, artificial intelligence finally determined its own policy. Artificial intelligence, the public money of every player according to how much of the starting money contributed redistributed. In this way, he tried to reduce wealth inequalities between players. In addition, those who do not contribute half of the initial funds The ‘freeloader’ gave the players almost nothing.

Players who voted on the policy of artificial intelligence along with the policies they developed, as the majority. policy created by artificial intelligence choosed. Other options for this policy were ‘egalitarian’, which distributed funds equally regardless of how much each person contributed, and ‘libertarian’, which distributed funds according to the proportion of each person’s contribution.

Artificial intelligence, although successful policy making, does not quite fit into democracy:

Although the DeepMind team managed to prove itself, artificial intelligence can’t afford democracy explained as follows:

“Democracy isn’t just about winning, implementing the policy you like best – it’s about creating processes where citizens can meet and argue with each other as equals.”

While the DeepMind team stated that artificial intelligence ignores the needs of minority groups (those who vote for other policies), there was also a counter-argument. Mathias Risse of Harvard University is acceptable among political scientists. shared. Risse in modern democracies disenfranchisement of the ‘majority’ by the economic elite He stressed that there are such problems.

So what do you think about this subject where artificial intelligence can affect human life the most?