A Joke Defense From Tosuncuk Who Appears Before The Judge

Turkey’s number one agenda item in the past years. Farm Bench There has been a new development in the case. A separate trial was held in which Mehmet Aydın, the founder of the organization, and his brother, Fatih Aydın, were on trial for “opposing the Banking Law”. by Mehmet Aydın His defense at the trial was remarkable.

One of the indictments prepared against Mehmet Aydın and Fatih Aydın was about the name of Çiftlik Bank. According to the indictment, the name “Bank” was used without permission, which was against the laws pertaining to the banking industry. In the defense made by Fatih Aydın, the official name of the company was “Farm Informatics Agriculture LivestockIt is stated that ” while Mehmet Aydın has not encountered any problems so far, and that the word bank is “seatHe said that he might have used it in the sense of “. The brothers, who said they were innocent, demanded their acquittal.

“I may have meant the seat”

Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BRSAMehmet Aydın, nicknamed Tosuncuk, said that the lawsuit filed by ) was unfair and said that the main people who should be prosecuted were the municipalities of 81 provinces because the municipalities gave their approval to this name. Since he also applied to the Turkish Patent Institute and who said he had no problems Aydın told the court:

“I advertised it on national channels and websites. I used this name on signs at my facilities. No problems occurred. No warning was given to me during this process. A lawsuit has been filed against me. The use of the word ‘bank’ is prohibited in the banking law. However, I used the term ‘bank’. The equivalent of the word ‘bank’ in the dictionary of the Turkish Language Association (TDK) is a seat used in parks and gardens. I may have meant the seatI may have meant something else. However, I did not use the term ‘bank’. I want my acquittal.”

“The crime was committed financially”

BRSA Lawyer Deniz Kubat, who was present at the hearing “By using the bank name criminal element has occurred. The use of the name ‘bank’ created the bank impression. They said that the defendants used the name ‘bank’, not ‘bank’ in their statements. The crime was materially committed.He accused the other party by using the statements “. on livestockIt has been declared that no advertisements are made on subjects such as deposits or withdrawals.

At the end of the hearing, the court temporary decision explained. In this interim decision, the examination of Çiftlik Bank advertisements and the Turkish Patent Institute were informed and it was determined whether the application in question existed. to be detected was ruled. The investigations to be made will enlighten at least one of the lawsuits against Çiftlik Bank.