10-Year-Old Car Will Be Replaced With 2022 Model

An important precedent decision was signed that concerns the citizens of the vehicle. Adana Regional Court of Justice 5th Civil Chamber decided to replace a 10-year-old car with a new one. Here’s the behind the scenes…

Adana Regional Court of Justice, the 5th Civil Chamber, is a law that concerns all citizens who own a vehicle. peer to the decision he signed. With this decision, it was decided to replace a 2012 model car with a new one. So what happened? How did a citizen win his legal fight? Replacing a 10-year-old car with a new one got the right? Let’s take a look at these details together.

A citizen named Ahmet Hocaoğlu, who lives in Mersin, bought a brand new car in 2012. Hocaoğlu, who had no problems in the first years, in 2017 He saw that his car had blemishes in its paint. So much so that the paint of the vehicle was peeling off on its own as if it were a sticker. After that, Hocaoğlu went to the service and encountered an unexpected result. The company states that the vehicle can be completely painted, but damage will not be covered told. After that, Hocaoğlu decided to file a lawsuit and won the legal battle that has been going on for 5 years.

The case was first dismissed, then seen again

Ahmet Hocaoğlu went to the consumer court first. The manufacturer company, in its defense, 3-year paint protection warranty He said that there was no problem in this process. The dealer dealer also argued that the vehicle was delivered in perfect condition. The court decided that this is a slight defect and can be fixed with paint, and that the problem occurred after a legal period of 2 years and expired, accordingly. dismissal of the case decided. Thereupon, Ahmet Hocaoğlu, who went to the upper court, ensured that the precedent decision was issued. Adana Regional Court of Justice 5th Civil Chamber, in the expert report manufacturing defect citing his statement, it decided to replace the 2012 model vehicle with a faultless one and to rehearse the case in the court of first instance.

RELATED NEWS

Precedent Decision Concerning Millions of Employees from the Supreme Court: GPRS Records Counted as ‘Overtime Evidence’

Lawyer Kurtuluş Kanat, who managed the process on behalf of Ahmet Hocaoğlu, made statements on the subject:This is a decision that will be precedent. Leaving and progressing of the paint like a leaf is a painting process error and it is not possible for the customer to realize this when the vehicle is purchased. There is no timeout for hidden defects caused by production. We have demonstrated this with the Supreme Court decisions we have presented. Our client’s vehicle will be replaced with a 2022 model, as there is a hidden defect caused by production here.”

Source :
https://www.ntv.com.tr/otomobil/10-yillik-aracini-sifiriyla-degistirecek-gizli-ayipta-zaman-asimi-yok-karari,BuB3pnJ0FUyp5alcvN9gKQ


source site-33