Will Wikipedia Content Use ChatGPT?

ChatGPT Chatbot developed by OpenAI ChatGPThas become the most talked about thing in the internet world in recent months. The AI ​​tool could quickly answer whatever you ask, write articles and even poems. We’ve even recently seen it prevent someone from getting a parking ticket.

The fact that the artificial intelligence tool is so impressive, of course, comes to everyone’s mind “Will everything that humans write right now be written by artificial intelligence?” brought the question to the fore and showed that there could be a revolution in many issues from broadcasting to social media. Of course, the world’s largest internet encyclopedia on Wikipedia It was a question of whether such a thing would happen. The founder of the site, who spoke this question to the Evening Standard Jimmy Wales replied.

According to Wales, ChatGPT is still not quite ready to write a Wikipedia article

Wales, one of the founders of Wikipedia, talked about how this giant encyclopedia might turn out in the future, saying that he thinks a lot about whether the contents are written by artificial intelligence. The 56-year-old entrepreneur is one of the models that people in the Wikipedia community are already seeing. not good enough He stated that he is cautious at the moment because of the reasons, but they are also curious about the possibilities that may occur.

In the continuation of Wales, ChatGPT’s for this not ready yetHe also stated that he could not predict when it would be ready. “I still think ‘ChatGPT, please write a Wikipedia article on the Empire State Building’ We are far from saying However, I don’t know how far we are from that.” The entrepreneur said, and then added that much better developments have been made in the last two years than he thought.

A big problem is that the model can give incorrect information.

Wales also stated that there are still many problems with ChatGPT: “One of the problems with current ChatGPT is what they call ‘hallucination’. I call it ‘lying’. make something out of the air It has a tendency to. This is very bad for Wikipedia. We have to be really careful about this.”

Artificial intelligence tools giving wrong information It was already a hotly debated topic. Many times before, people have presented evidence that models like ChatGPT sometimes do not provide accurate information. For example, according to the Evening Standard, a month ago an economist from the University of Queensland told ChatGPT “What is the most cited economics article of all time?” he asked a question.

The chatbot, on the other hand, found an answer to this question within seconds, and this article’s “‘A Theory of Economic History’ by Dougless North and Robert Thomas, published in The Journal of Economic History in 1969 said that. Although this answer seems to be true, when the article was researched later, it was actually such an article turned out not to be. The authors and the journal were real; but such an article has never been written. This is the model sometimes fake answers proved that he could.

ChatGPT Saved A Dog’s Life: Vet Undetectable Disease Detected by GPT-4

In addition to these, Wales is also within ChatGPT itself. your contradictions added that. Entrepreneur turns to artificial intelligence tool “Has the Empire State ever been hit by a plane?” asked the question. The model, on the other hand, replied that such a thing did not happen at first, but then a plane crashed into it. This showed another problem of the technology.

How can AI models be integrated into Wikipedia in the near future?

While all this poses a problem for Wikipedia, Wales believes that artificial intelligence can be used for the site. some advantages He also says he can. An example is the possibility of using this technology to check if two Wikipedias are in conflict with each other. Thus, it is stated that people will not have to read both articles and this can be done automatically.

Finally, artificial intelligence prejudiced There are also concerns that it might happen. In other words, an AI-powered Wikipedia can make the platform even more biased, which has already been criticized for being biased (for reasons such as the majority of its editors being white).

These explanations show that artificial intelligence-generated content will not come to Wikipedia for now, due to the flaws of the models. However, if the development of technology continues at this rate and the problems can be eliminated, such a possibility may be real.