Using a Pre-Marriage Surname Can’t Be Confidence Shattered

The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ordered her husband to use her previous surname on social media.trust breaker“The decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals is that no woman should use her new surname after marriage on social media. obligation not revealed.

There were mutual accusations in the case heard by the Family Court. While the parties blamed each other for different reasons, the man thought that his wife should use her surname on social media. However 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Courtdecided that it was not a requirement. According to the Supreme Court, women using the surname before marriagecannot be invoked as evidence of a distrust-breaking situation.

Not reason, not proof

The Family Court, finding both parties to be at fault, compensation their demands refused. Both parties then appealed the decision. In the examinations of the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, this decision was given as a precedent. made written statement the following statements were made:

From the trial and the evidence collected; Especially the ‘use of maiden name in social media accounts’ attributed to the defendant woman as evidence of this person’s distrustful behavior. inadmissible Similarly, since it cannot be qualified as a breach of trust, according to the other faulty behaviors of the parties accepted and realized by the court, the claimant man is seriously flawed and the defendant woman is less flawed it is understood to be.