According to an interesting event in the USA, a lawyer’s office litigation defense for ChatGPT used his vehicle. The lawyer, representing clients suing an airline, enlisted the help of artificial intelligence to investigate the case. However, it turned out that the information provided by ChatGPT was not true.
The attorney cited ChatGPT as the source; information is wrong
Attorney Steven Schwartz became the subject of controversy when he got help from the chatbot. Finding that the information presented about the airline was false, US District Judge Kevin Castel said he did not trust the plaintiffs’ claims.
In a counter-defense by the airline’s lawyer, many of the cases attributed to the airline were reported to be fabrications. The use of the chatbot for litigation has raised serious concerns about the reliability of artificial intelligence.
Google Bard will make ChatGPT look obsolete!
According to the statement, Bard will also transfer visual results from Google search results to its users.
On the other hand, Judge Castel decided to sanction the plaintiff lawyer for the misleading statement. However, Schwartz asked the chatbot if he was “lying” to confirm the authenticity of the events.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, claimed that the information it provided was accurate and could be found on some legal research platforms. However, it turned out that none of the accidents he mentioned were related to the airline company. When asked about the source, ChatGPT apologized and said the incident was “anonymous”.
Although artificial intelligence has entered all areas of our lives, its use in legal matters has become a matter of debate. However, recently artificial intelligence-based Supreme Court Jurisprudence Center opened. This center, which will be trained with precedent decisions, will evaluate the reasoned decisions.
So what do you think about the ChatGPT lawsuit? Do not forget to share your views with us in the comments section!