OpenAI: NYT attempted to hack ChatGPT

The training processes of artificial intelligence giants such as OpenAI continue to be discussed. There were interesting developments in the latest case between the New York Times and OpenAI. OpenAI claimed that “the system was hacked” with some questions asked to ChatGPT.

What’s going on between OpenAI and the New York Times?

OpenAI has reached a critical point in its copyright dispute with the New York Times. The artificial intelligence giant accused the company of producing misleading evidence for the case. According to OpenAI’s statement, the New York Times collected misleading information by manipulating ChatGPT.

OpenAI, which filed a court application in the copyright case, said that some of the artificial intelligence chat outputs presented by the Times were not real. The company said the Times used “deceptive commands that clearly violate OpenAI’s terms of use” when interacting with chatbots, including ChatGPT.

He's growing while everyone else is declining!  Honor conquered Europe

He’s growing while everyone else is declining! Honor conquered Europe

Honor, which has increased its awareness in the smartphone market in the last few years, announced its targets for 2024.

OpenAI described this situation as a “hacking of their systems”. However, the company did not explain how the Times breached this hacking attempt.

For those who don’t know, the New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and its investor Microsoft in December. Accordingly, millions of companies’ articles were used to train chatbots without permission. The lawsuit demands that AI training qualify under copyright law.

ChatGPT's popular feature is free!

In its response, OpenAI argued that the allegations in the Times’ complaint “do not meet journalistic standards.” It should be noted that OpenAI and New York Times representatives declined to comment on the allegations.

What do you think about this subject? What do you think about the ChatGPT hack attempt? You can share your opinions with us in the Comments section below.

source site-28