New information has come from the affordable POCO X4 5G!

POCO, which appears in the industry as an independent brand of Xiaomi, will soon showcase its new products. The company continues to work on the more affordable X4 5G, in addition to the POCO X4 Pro 5G model, which has been on the agenda for a long time and appeared in e-Government in the past weeks. In fact, a while ago, the device appeared in the Geekbench database.


A POCO model has started receiving the MIUI 13 update

A phone of Xiaomi’s sub-brand POCO has released the new Android 12-based MIUI 13 update! Here is that phone and details…

POCO X4 5G appeared on Geekbench

As it is known, POCO has been on the agenda for a while with the X4 5G model. The smartphone, which has appeared on various certification sites to date, has finally appeared in the Geekbench database. POCO X4 5G has appeared on Geekbench with model number 2201116PG. It is also worth noting that the letter “G” in the model number represents global markets.

The smartphone managed to score 657 points in single-core tests and 2 thousand 53 points in multi-core tests. Thus, some of the technical features of the device became clear.

The device listed on Geekbench has 6GB of RAM. At this point, it is quite possible that there will be another 8 GB variant. On the processor side, there will be Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. Produced with a 6 nm fabrication process, the chipset hosts the Adreno 619 graphics unit in addition to two .2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 (Kryo 660) and six 1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 cores.

Apart from that, there are claims that the device is a rebranded version of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, which was presented to users in the past weeks. Because the “veux” codename in the Geekbench database confirms these rumors. We will most likely find out if the claims in question are true on the day the device is introduced.

So what do you think about this subject? Do you think POCO X4 5G is the rebranded version of Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G? Do not forget to share your views with us in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.

source site-30