New information about the affordable POCO F4 GT has arrived!

Continuing to work as an independent brand of Xiaomi, POCO will soon appear in front of users with its new products. New details have emerged about the POCO F4 GT, another affordable smartphone that the company has been working on, which has been on the agenda with the X4 Pro 5G, which has been on the agenda for a while.


New information has come from the affordable POCO X4 5G!

POCO will soon present the affordable X4 5G model to users. In fact, some of the technical features of the device have been revealed.

Affordable POCO F4 GT appeared on certification sites

The POCO FT GT appeared in the FCC, IMEI, EEC and TUV databases with the model number 21121210G. It should also be noted that the letter “G” in the model number represents global markets. Thus, some of the technical features of the smartphone have become clear.

The device will come with an FHD+ resolution OLED panel that offers 120 Hz refresh and 480 Hz touch sampling rate. The fingerprint reader, which is determined as a security method, will be placed under the screen.

According to the allegations, the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 processor will be used on the smartphone. In the processor produced with the 4 nm fabrication process 1 pc 3.05GHz Arm Cortex-X2 performance core, 3 pcs 2.85GHz Arm Cortex-A710 and 4 units It has a 1.8GHz Arm Cortex-A510 efficiency core. On the graphics side, there is the Arm Mali-G710 chip.

POCO F4 GT, affordable poco

The POCO F4 GT, which is expected to come with a dual-cell 4,560 mAh battery, will run the Android 12-based MIUI 13 interface as soon as it comes out of the box. Apart from that, there are also claims that the device is the rebranded version of Redmi K50 Gaming, which will be introduced on February 16. However, no statement has been made about the rumors for now.

So what do you think about this subject? Do you think the POCO F4 GT could be the allegedly rebranded version of Redmi K50 Gaming? Do not forget to share your views with us in the comments section or on the SDN Forum.

source site-31