New Claim in Data Leakage Scandal: There Are 101 Million People!

Recently FreeWeb Turkey We met with a platform that went beyond data leaks with the news shared by. A website even listed on Google had compiled, processed and linked a lot of leaked information to a panel.

with this panel at no cost You can access the family tree of anyone whose ID number or phone number you know, by paying very small fees. even address information. you could arrive. Today, new information has surfaced about this platform.

You can take a look at our article below to remember the event, and return here after better understanding the seriousness of the situation.

The data of 101 million people, not 85 million, is on the panel!

Barış Altıntaş from FreeWeb Turkey directly reached the platform’s Telegram and Discord channels and heard critical information on an audio channel. Altıntaş, the website in question E.Ö. that it belongs to a user named, this “paneling” job on the voice channel There are people who have been doing it for years expressed.

Although E.Ö. did not answer Altıntaş’s questions, other people answered his critical questions. Information such as how many people got their data in total, where this data was taken from, and how many similar panels were found. shared.

According to what Altıntaş learned from these people, the panel includes the information of not only the citizens of the Republic of Turkey, but also other people whose foreign identity numbers were seized. Therefore, not 85 million, The data of 101 million people in total is in circulation.

Moreover, these data are not only available on the platform that is on the agenda. According to the reports of people, there are many different panels similar to this platform. According to Füsun Sarp Nebil from Yetkin Report, another name on the channel. It is located at 5 different addresses.

Where did the data in this panel come from?

According to the information that the journalists said they received directly from the persons concerned, the data, As a result of the following database leaks obtained:

• 2009 and 2015 election data (including TCKN, name, surname, population province, population district, address data)
• 2022 Public Health Management System data (Contains TCKN, name, surname, date of birth, population province, population district, mother’s name, mother’s TCKN, father’s name, father’s TCKN, nationality. 101 million data are included)
• 116 million phone numbers (including TCKN, GSM data)
• 2023 voter data (withdrawn from https://sts.chp.org.tr) Data such as ballot box and school voted with TR ID number were taken.

Currently, personal data can be obtained from some addresses affiliated with the state!

There is an even more striking claim in the case. Altıntaş said that the panelists he spoke with are currently addresses to which the government openly provides data He shared that he said he was too. These addresses are listed as follows:

• Address and family number, volume number, serial number etc. a government site from which identity information is withdrawn. This address is Internet Tax Office (https://intvrg.gib.gov.tr). It does not require any administrator account, even a normal citizen can access this data.

• Until a week ago, a normal citizen could see the e-school certificate of anyone he wanted via e-school. Currently, with the principal user account, the person’s document, school number, graduation status-year, and name and surname can be accessed.

• Until a month ago, citizens’ address data could be obtained through the Ankara Governor’s Office. Site link: “https://ahsl.asm.gov.tr/webgiris/order.php” (Currently requires login).

“Advice” from “panelists” to the government

Altıntaş also included the recommendations given to the state by the panelists. To prevent panelists from leaking further data what you said to the state shared as follows:

• The state should stop making official sites outsource companies to tender.

• The government should make two-step verification with GSM mandatory on their sites.

• The state should establish an institution for its sites and open a separate special department for security in this institution.

• The state should impose an interrogation limit for civil servants on its sites, and these limits should not be exceeded by various deficits.

• The government should be more cautious when giving data to companies and citizens.