Farm Bank founder Mehmet Aydın announced his total assets!

One of the biggest profiteering in the history of Turkey and tens of thousands of people were victims. Farm Bench the case is still ongoing. In the process that gained momentum after the surrender of the company’s founder, Mehmet Aydın, new developments are also emerging.

Finally, according to the news of Damla Güler from Milliyet, “Tosuncuknicknamed ” Mehmet AydinHis wealth was revealed. The defendant, who was tried for 83 thousand 446 years in prison within the scope of 3 separate cases, made striking statements about his wealth. Here are the details…


Flash statements from Çiftlik Bank founder Mehmet Aydın!

The statements made by the founder of Çiftlik Bank to tv100 are shocking. Mehmet Aydın’s claims are quite striking.

What is the fortune of Mehmet Aydın, nicknamed “Tosuncuk”?

Detained defendants in the hearing held by the Istanbul 6th High Criminal Court Mehmet Aydin and his brother Fatih Aydin While participating via remote connection, 5 pending defendants were also present at the hearing. In the process that started with the statements and statements of the victims, the allegations were asked to the detained defendants.

Responding to allegations Mehmet Aydin, said that the product was promoted in the advertisements on the television and that they did not encourage anyone to invest money. He stated that his intention was not to defraud anyone. TosuncukHe said that there is a clause in the user agreement that the principal will be refunded within 90 days in case of a possible closure, but because people complained immediately, they could not refund.

The most striking moment in the court was when Aydın was asked about his wealth. Saying that his money is in Uruguay, Tosuncuk announced that he has 34 million liras there. Declaring that his total wealth is over 200 million liras, he asked for the calculation of his total assets.

At the end of the case, the prosecutor demanded the continuation of the detention of the defendants and that the measures against their assets not be lifted. Approving these demands, the court decided to postpone the hearing. Once again, it remains a mystery whether the victims will be able to get their money in the protracted process.

So what do you think about this subject? Farm Bench You can share your opinions about the case with us in the comments section.

source site-31