Donald Trump’s lawsuit against Twitter was dismissed

During the period when he was the President of the USA, we are accustomed to hearing his name every day. Donald Trumpwas banned from many social media platforms on the grounds that his posts caused hate speech and outrage; One of those who closed Trump’s account twitter had happened. On top of that, his social media account truthTrump, who founded the Twitter account reopening He also applied to the court.

There has been a very important development in this case today. A district judge in California has dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against Twitter. ‘rejected’.

Judge says Trump’s Twitter ban is perfectly legal

Judge James Donato: Trump’s Twitter ban in 2021 ‘completely legal’ He denied the case, stating that On the other hand, it was stated that Trump and a group of other banned users have until May 27 to change their complaints and file a complaint again.

But even if this decision does warrant an appeal, any amended version from the Trump wing will be rejected. a tough fight It means to be faced with. The order specifically defies Trump’s claims that Twitter violates the First Amendment and that Section 230 of the Communications Ethics Act is unconstitutional. However, in Judge Donato’s analysis, the claims of the plaintiff Trump a strong foundation The fact that Trump and others expelled from Twitter shows that the trend is not so bright.

Twitter’s terms of service state that an account can be suspended for no reason at any time.

When Trump filed the lawsuit, some lawmakers took to Twitter to ban him. on call claimed to be present; However, Donato firmly stated that these claims are not true and that Twitter was a part of Trump’s expulsion from the platform. does not work as a state factor states. In the decision, “Legislators are completely free to express their opinions without being seen as the official voice of the ‘State'” statements are included. However, allegations that authorities called for a ban are also denied.

The reason behind the failure of the article 230 claim; Trump and the plaintiffs did not make any connection between the law and the prohibitions. did not show is shown as. Stating that accounts can be suspended for any reason or no reason in accordance with Twitter’s Terms of Service, Donato stated that, in these provisions, that there is nothing secretive or misleading expressed.

Considering the fact that Trump will not be able to add new allegations to an amended file, this is hardly a final decision unless it dramatically changes the judge’s reasoning. will be no different means. Of course, the latest developments on the Twitter front, namely Elon Musk’s ‘a freer place’ When we think that he bought the platform with the promise of Trump’s account, Twitter voluntarily It is also possible to guess that it will somehow be restored.