Republicans in the US House of Representatives revised a recent law following the XRP lawsuit. The new law gives the CFTC, another major US regulator, new powers for the judiciary.
US House revises law issued in June following XRP decision
Republican members introduced a new cryptocurrency surveillance bill on Thursday that aims to establish a regulatory framework to protect investors in the crypto industry. The law in question first appeared in June. After Judge Torres’ decision in favor of XRP, significant revisions to the market structure and stablecoin laws of the June draft took place.
The revised bill excludes a number of traditional securities from the “digital asset” category, which some say are bad for DeFi. However, it aims to create comprehensive rules for cryptocurrencies in general. The law in question came at a time when the US was aggressive towards cryptocurrencies.
The bill first appeared in June. As of Thursday, XRP received a few revisions shortly after its decision. One of them aims to establish a regulatory path for cryptocurrency exchanges to register with the SEC. It also aims to enable them to trade digital securities, commodities and stablecoins in one place.
New rules give both CFTC and SEC a seat at the table
House of Representatives Dusty Johnson said at this point, “The crypto industry wants clarity. Our joint design gives both the CFTC and the SEC a seat at the table. Our design continues to innovate for developers. Meanwhile, it sets clear principles to ensure financial security and certainty.”
Gabriel Shapiro, general counsel at Delphi Labs, noted a change in the June discussion draft that “completely alters the value proposition in the bill” and reaffirms the uncertainty it is trying to resolve. Accordingly, on Page 10, the revised bill excludes a number of traditional securities from the definition of “digital assets,” such as stocks, bonds, “transferable shares,” “certificates of participation in interest or any profit-sharing agreement.”
New DeFi projects may be redlisted
As a result, Shapiro wrote on Twitter that a number of coins available in the DeFi market, such as Compound’s cTokens or Liquid Collective’s Liquid Staking Tokens, “will be largely regulated under this provision, even if they are not under current law.” Shapiro, the SEC can still go the war route. All they have to do is make a token ‘transferable share’, ‘a dividend’ etc. It is to claim that it is,” he warns.
The new version makes a few key changes after the XRP decision
The new law will allow exchanges and firms to submit a statement of intent to register with the SEC or CFTC. It will also include definitions of digital assets and decentralized assets under securities law and commodity laws. However, it requires the SEC and CFTC to “prepare additional guidance to facilitate the development of tokenized securities and derivatives. Additionally, it will force a collaborative effort to assess whether the rules are necessary.
Regulators will consider rules that affect the fairness of markets, public interest and investor protection.
If the bill is passed in the House, it will be up to the Democratic-led Senate to decide on the bill. Some Democrats, such as Maxine Waters, have expressed concern about the bill. Also, the SEC, led by Gary Gensler, has repeatedly said there is no need for new rules to define cryptocurrencies. But the Ripple and SEC decision shows that digital assets require new rules and definitions.
The crypto community reacted positively to the new law
“If we want to be taken seriously as a nation, we have to take it seriously as a nation,” said Paul Grewal, CLO of Coinbase. This legislation would finally bring the US into the global conversation about digital asset regulation. “Congress should enact this without delay.”
Pro-XRP attorney John Deaton has suggested that some are still trying to attack crypto. He said he would save his opinion for this for later.
Finally, Dan Gambardello stated that Cardano and DeFi attracted all the attention after the announcement. Crypto law is critical to ensure regulatory clarity and certainty for digital assets in the US. cryptocoin.com We have included the developments from Canada in May in this article.
Contact us to be instantly informed about the last minute developments. twitter‘in, Facebookin and InstagramFollow on. Telegram And YouTube join our channel!
Risk Disclosure: The articles and articles on Kriptokoin.com do not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are high-risk assets, and you should do your due diligence and do your own research before investing in these currencies. You can lose some or all of your money by investing in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Remember that your transfers and transactions are at your own risk and any losses that may occur are your responsibility. Cryptokoin.com does not recommend buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is Kriptokoin.com an investment advisor. For this reason, Kriptokoin.com and the authors of the articles on the site cannot be held responsible for your investment decisions. Readers should do their own research before taking any action regarding the company, assets or services in this article.
Disclaimer: Advertisements on Kriptokoin.com are carried out through third-party advertising channels. In addition, Kriptokoin.com also includes sponsored articles and press releases on its site. For this reason, advertising links directed from Kriptokoin.com are on the site completely independent of Kriptokoin.com’s approval, and visits and pop-ups directed by advertising links are the responsibility of the user. The advertisements on Kriptokoin.com and the pages directed by the links in the sponsored articles do not bind Kriptokoin.com in any way.
Warning: Citing the news content of Kriptokoin.com and quoting by giving a link is subject to the permission of Kriptokoin.com. No content on the site can be copied, reproduced or published on any platform without permission. Legal action will be taken against those who use the code, design, text, graphics and all other content of Kriptokoin.com in violation of intellectual property law and relevant legislation.