Striking Discussions Arose About Coronavirus

While the issue of whether the coronavirus has leaked from a laboratory in China has been on the agenda in the past months, there has been an important development in this regard. The Telegraph found some important information by examining the experts’ publicly shared emails.

Some documents that have been served to the US press in the past months, the US doctor of the coronavirus epidemic by Anthony Faucihad revealed that it had started a grant program so that a laboratory in Wuhan, where the epidemic started, could work. Moreover, allegations were made that the coronavirus epidemic may have originated from this laboratory funded by Fauci.

Since those days, the target of the opposition in the USA for a long time, Dr. New information has emerged about Anthony Fauci today. This time, Fauci came to the fore with his e-mails, which were made public in the summer of 2021, but were not examined in detail at that time. These emails were received in the first days of February 2020 by Dr. Fauci and his US National Institutes of Health colleague Dr. It was written to Francis Collins. E-mails, some experts suspected that SARS-CoV-2 had leaked from the laboratory in question., but from discussing it ‘for political reasons‘ He was showing hesitation.

Experts took the laboratory theory seriously:

In an email dated February 2, 2020, one of the emails handled by The Telegraph, Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, a health research fundraiser, told Fauci and Collins this: from laboratory theory was talking. Farrar said the virus evolved from a SARS-like virus that was studied on human tissue in a low-security laboratory.a possible explanation‘ he had stated.

In the email, Farrar mentioned that this evolution “may have accidentally produced a virus that could spread rapidly among humans,” while Dr. Collins, “further discussion on science in general and China in particular. would unduly harm scientific studies.” he meant. Collins, it’smay undermine international harmony. He also warned about

Did the virus leak from the lab or was it a natural event?

coronavirus wuhan

In addition, Farrar says other experts believes he could not have evolved naturally was writing. Among the experts in question, Prof., who discovered how the SARS virus attaches to human cells. Dr. Mike Farzan was also involved. Expressing Farzan’s concerns in an email, Farrar used the following statements:

“(Farzan) is disturbed by the Furin (a protease enzyme encoded by the FURIN gene in humans and other animals) region. He has a hard time explaining this as an event that happened outside the lab. There are possible paths in nature, but the possibilities are not very high. I think it boils down to the question of how you put all this together, whether you believe this string of coincidences, what you know about the lab in Wuhan, how much it could be in nature – accidental release or natural event? I am 70:30 or 60:40.

RELATED NEWS

New Statement from Bill Gates on When the Epidemic Will End

In the email above, Farrar was assessing the probability of the virus leaking from the lab/natural event as 70 to 30 or 60 to 40. So, he was more prone to the idea that this virus had leaked from the lab. On the other hand, in another e-mail sent on February 4, Farrar said, set this probability to 50:50. announced. Professor at the University of Sydney. Dr. Eddie Holmes, on the other hand, stated his probability as 60:40.

Among the names mentioned in the e-mails and cited as considering the laboratory theory as possible are Bob Garry from the University of Texas and Prof. Dr. Andrew Rambaut was also present. These e-mails contain the experts’ lab theory. take it more seriously than you think was showing.

Source :
https://www.indyturk.com/node/458866/sa%C4%9Flik/faucinin-e-mails%C4%B1-coronavir%C3%BCs%C3%BCn-vuhan-laboratory%C4%B1ndan-s% C4%B1zd%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1n%C4%B1-d%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCnen


source site-33