When you commit a crime without knowing it’s a crime “I didn’t know about the law.” Saying it won’t save you. In particular, there is a lack of information on some technology-related crimes.
someone else’s photos screenshot store without permission give your number to someone elsean insulting tweet to RT and more… Many people are committing acts like these, but they are unaware that they are actually criminal elements.
After reading the content, you will be more careful and against you. on crimes committed you will have an idea. This legal information we will talk about may be useful to you one day. Here are some of them:
Storing someone else’s documents or pictures by taking screenshots constitutes the crime of recording personal data and the penalty is 1 to 3 years in prison.
TCK m. 135
Giving someone else’s phone number without their consent constitutes the crime of illegally disseminating personal data.
12th Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court
2014/607 E. 2014/16665 K.
Phone, internet, etc. No penalty will be paid if you withdraw from subscription agreements longer than 1 year.
In contracts with a commitment period longer than 1 year, the consumer can cancel the contract at any time without giving any reason and does not pay any penalty.
The driver who hits an animal and harms it must take it to the nearest veterinarian or treatment unit and ensure that it is taken.
Animal Protection Law art.21
The fees collected from the students under the name of donation are against the law and if they are not paid, the sanctions applied to the student are also unlawful.
If the window film in the car does not obstruct the view, administrative sanctions cannot be applied.
19th Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court
2016/376 E. 2016/201120 K.
The teacher cannot keep students in class as punishment after the recess bell rings.
Taxi drivers cannot refuse passengers on the excuse of short distance. An administrative fine of 2.265 TL is imposed on taxi drivers who are found not to take short-distance passengers.
Liking an insulting social media post does not constitute an insult. “Retweeting” the insulting tweet constitutes the offense of insult. Writing “retweets don’t mean approval” on your profile may not save you either.
5th Penal Chamber of the Supreme Court
2013/5598E
18th Penal Chamber of the Supreme Court
2015/10377 E. 2015/12777 K.
Operating his wife with a fake account on social media and trying to create evidence against his wife are grounds for divorce.
2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court
2015/13454 E. 2016/4141 K.
In the event that someone’s belongings are destroyed, damaged or stolen in the shopping mall or in the shopping mall parking lot, the shopping mall operator is responsible. Even if he declares “We Are Not Responsible for Stolen Goods”, he cannot escape responsibility.
Accessing sexually explicit sites is a serious fault in divorce cases.
The teacher’s expulsion of the student from the course for any reason constitutes the crime of “preventing the right to education and training”.
In case of sending an unordered product, the consumer has no obligation to return the goods.
TKHK m. 7
The owner of the vehicle cannot be fined for a vehicle that is taken without permission from the owner and is under the control of an unlicensed person.
19th Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court
2019/18946 E. 2020/8274 K.
The defendant’s failure to delete the photos on social media that were taken together while they were dating, despite the request of the victim, constitutes the crime of illegally giving personal data.
GSM operators are obliged to inform the consumer in case of exceeding the quota. In case of non-compliance with this obligation, the responsibility of the GSM operator will arise.
3rd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court
2014/20558 E. 2015/16478 K.
The bank is “responsible” for the stolen money of the person waiting to deposit money at the bank branch.
2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court
2015/10105 E. 2016/901 K.
Correspondence made in electronic media such as mail, WhatsApp, Facebook are documents and evidence.
13th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court
2017/1014 E. 2020/4488 K. 10.06.2020 T.
Since the computer is a necessary household item in today’s conditions, it cannot be seized.
Supreme Court 12. HD 2012/27279 E. 2013/11536 K.
Confidential audio recordings obtained illegally cannot be used as evidence in criminal and private law proceedings.
It is also considered as an element of crime within the scope of “Protection of the Privacy of Private Life”. However, in some exceptional cases, these audio recordings are accepted as legal evidence.
Along with the person who sent abusive messages on Facebook, the line owner who gave him the Wi-Fi password is also responsible for non-pecuniary damage.
Resources: one, 2nd