Intel Arc A350M fails benchmark tests

Intel introduced the Arc A-series mobile graphics cards last month. YouTuber bullslab made it with Intel Arc A350M graphics card.I benchmark test shared the results.

The Intel Arc A family is currently only available in the South Korean market. The graphics card, which is expected to be sold in other countries soon, is used by Samsung in their laptops.


The release date of the new generation AMD graphics cards has been announced!

The release date of AMD RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT and RX 6650 XT graphics cards has been announced. The company will launch the devices with a 1-month delay.

Intel Arc A350M did not live up to expectations in the benchmark test

Bullslab, graphics card NT950XEV-G51A stated that it was located on a Samsung laptop with a product code. On device with display card Core i5-1240P Alder Lake It has a 12-core processor and 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM. 1080p 60Hz AMOLED panel is preferred as the screen technology.

Intel Arc A350M benchmark failed to meet expectations

Arc A350M, the lowest spec graphics card in the Arc Alchemist series, has 4GB of memory. Introduced with a 64-bit memory bus, the graphics card has ACM-G11 with 768 Shaders.

Intel Arc A350M model with 30W, 3DMark In the test, it managed to beat the Nvidia GeForce MX450 with 25W TDP. The graphics card, which is clearly behind the GTX 1650, unfortunately did not meet the expectations in terms of gaming performance.

Bullslab, which preferred games such as PUBG, League of Legends and Overwatch in game tests, realized that the clock speed was 2.2GHz. Stating that the video card does not work stable while playing games, YouTuber underlined that it does not run games such as Forza Horizon 5 and COD Cold War.

The Intel Arc A350M appeared in the PUBG test with values ​​between 11 and 35 FPS. In the League of Legends game, the graphics card, which can reach up to 100 FPS, has not yet reached a sufficient level due to the driver problem.

What do you think about this subject? You can share your ideas in the comments section and on the SDN Forum.

source site-30