Forbes has removed an article criticizing US regulators’ stance on the cryptocurrency market. The article, which covered the biggest crypto lawsuit in recent years, provided a primary source on how to classify altcoins/tokens.
Forbes removed SEC article defending this altcoin project
The American business magazine has removed an article titled “Why the SEC Treats Ripple and Ethereum Differently”. The article is by Senior Forbes Author on Tech Policy, Dr. It was written by Roslyn Layton and was critical of the unfair treatment of Ripple by the SEC.
Not surprisingly, this decision sparked outrage within the XRP community. The censorship of an issue that has not been brought up for a long time has caused concern in the crypto community.
Forbes raised important issues against the SEC
Despite its removal, we are familiar with the content of the article thanks to screenshots shared by members of the XRP community, revealing that the article is still viewable in reader mode in selected browsers.
In the article, Dr. Layton questions why the SEC gave free pass to Ethereum in the controversial 2018 Bill Hinman speech. Describing this as a potential “inconsistency” in regulations, the policy researcher says the problem may lie in the hotly debated Hinman documents.
The Hinman documents refer to emails and other materials related to the preparation of the controversial speech. At one point in particular, the conversation became the focus of the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple, and the regulator initially resisted Ripple’s efforts to access the documents.
While the SEC finally handed over the documents to Ripple last October after previously resisting six court orders, it is now trying to keep the documents sealed, according to the Omnibus moves made last December. The Court reiterated that these negotiations were subject to attorney-client privilege, adding that leaving them open to public scrutiny could adversely affect the agency’s ability to negotiate policy in the future.
The article says different rules have been applied to altcoin projects over time
Dr. In his article, Layton expressed his view that it was a hard sell, given the SEC’s argument that he said was guiding the nascent market. He argues that these documents may clarify whether the free switch to Ethereum was due to Hinman’s alleged conflict of interest, or whether there was confusion among regulators with industry participants that could justify Ripple’s fair-disclosure defense. As a result, he filed a petition with the court requesting that the documents be unsealed, as reported today.
Unsurprisingly, members of the XRP community have expressed their anger at the fact that Forbes appears to have removed the article. Quoting the article announcing the company’s Forbes author’s filing, attorney John Deaton expressed shock by writing “Wth.”
By the way, Forbes had previously removed an article by the Tech Policy author. However, it is worth noting that the author wanted to edit the fragment in the previous example. Currently, Dr. Layton and Forbes have yet to respond to requests for comment. cryptocoin.com We will update the details on this page.
Contact us to be instantly informed about the last minute developments. twitter‘in, Facebookin and InstagramFollow and Telegram And YouTube join our channel!
Risk Disclosure: The articles and articles on Kriptokoin.com do not constitute investment advice. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are high-risk assets, and you should do your due diligence and do your own research before investing in these currencies. You can lose some or all of your money by investing in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Remember that your transfers and transactions are at your own risk and any losses that may occur are your responsibility. Cryptokoin.com does not recommend buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is Kriptokoin.com an investment advisor. Therefore, Kriptokoin.com and the authors of the articles on the site cannot be held responsible for your investment decisions. Readers should do their own research before taking any action regarding the company, assets or services in this article.
Disclaimer: Advertisements on Kriptokoin.com are carried out through third-party advertising channels. In addition, Kriptokoin.com also includes sponsored articles and press releases on its site. For this reason, advertising links directed from Kriptokoin.com are on the site completely independent of Kriptokoin.com’s approval, and visits and pop-ups directed by advertising links are the responsibility of the user. The advertisements on Kriptokoin.com and the pages directed by the links in the sponsored articles do not bind Kriptokoin.com in any way.
Warning: Citing the news content of Kriptokoin.com and quoting by giving a link is subject to the permission of Kriptokoin.com. No content on the site can be copied, reproduced or published on any platform without permission. Legal action will be taken against those who use the code, design, text, graphics and all other content of Kriptokoin.com in violation of intellectual property law and relevant legislation.