Exploratory talk at “Hart aber fair” – criticism of Laschet dismantling – politics

In the election campaign, the candidate spoke to the SPD and the others did not. Now everyone is talking, just not the candidate. In “hard but fair”, Frank Plasberg asks: “Sound out the future: will the parties succeed?”

The guests

Gerhart Baum (88, FDP). The Elder Statesman of the Liberals was once Federal Minister of the Interior for Scholz Idol Helmut Schmidt.

Felix Banaszak (31, Greens). The NRW state chief cheers: “We are sending 28 people (2017: 12) to Berlin and thus have the largest state group!”

Sarna Röser (35). The federal head of the “Young Entrepreneurs” calls for “Climate protection and digitization with the economy, not against it!”

Ulrike Herrmann (57). The journalist (“taz”) teases: “The talks between the FDP and the Union are just a show to blackmail the SPD a bit.”

Robin alexander (46). The WELT deputy groans: “Armin Laschet only operates political insolvency delays!”

Is there still any support for the Union in this group? The Zoff-o-Meter prepares for new fouls!

Most sobering opening speech

The WELT Vice-President considers the traffic light to be the most likely coalition, “because there are processes in the CDU that they no longer stick together properly.”

The “taz” colleague thinks “that it is not possible at the moment to form a coalition with the Union”. Because: “There is not only the CDU, which is sinking into chaos, but also the CSU, so actually four parties would form a coalition.”

Most interesting observation

“I think it is against all political decency how they are now dealing with their top candidate Laschet,” the FDP grandee raves. “He really doesn’t deserve that!”

Baum likes the alliance FDP / Greens, also because “both of the union members have won”. That is a “small signal that the FDP is opening up again in social liberal areas.” Ui!

Most useful DIY tip

An ARD-Einspieler quotes how the Green boss imagines his party’s cooperation with the FDP: “I was thinking of thick boards and a SPAX screw!” Habeck said.

The young green politician can explain for two minutes at a time what should be considered in a yellow-green coalition. Then Plasberg stops him with an obvious question: “Do you know what a SPAX screw is?”

Banaszak wants to talk himself out of it: “I’m currently renovating. In this respect … “

But the talk show host does not give up: “What does SPAX stand for?”

The green laughs embarrassed: “Now you’ve caught me on the wrong foot,” he confesses.

“I checked,” says Plasberg triumphantly. “That stands for chipboard screw with cross slots.” Was that all? A lot of fuss, little income!

Couldn’t really classify the metaphors of his party leader: NRW state chief of the Greens Felix BanaszakPhoto: ARD

Most optimistic forecast

The young entrepreneur lists the failures of the GroKo: digitization, climate protection, education, bureaucracy. Your hope: “We have a chance to really shape a departure towards the future with the FDP and the Greens.”

Clearest analysis

WELT-Alexander does not believe in the alleged new love between green and liberal: “The young people who have voted for the FDP, their red-green teachers, the red-green media and all the Fridays For Future sounding on the chains,” rants he.

With sweeping arm movements, the journalist adds: “I think there is this pragmatic approach by Scholz – they are there, I now puzzle them together – in the end even more durable than a ‘generation project’ and a ‘reconciliation of ecology and economy’.” Heidewitzka!

Rabia tester troublemaker


Not really convinced of the alleged love between Liberals and Greens: World Cup Vice-President Robin Alexander

Not really convinced of the alleged love between Liberals and Greens: World Cup Vice-President Robin AlexanderPhoto: ARD

About the photo of the first yellow-green exploratory discussion, Alexander scoffs: “They wanted to give a signal: We can talk to each other at all. When you need such a signal. “

“Without journalists”, Plasberg blurts him. “There is no press photo of it. You are a little offended! “

“I offended?” Defends the WELT vice. “They posted that on Instagram, where the horse photos and the beautiful women are! We don’t want to believe that the four of them are enthusiastic about each other! “

Most devastating maneuver criticism

“With Söder everything would have looked completely different,” believes the “taz” journalist. “The CDU would have been ahead, the SPD would not put the candidate for chancellor, and it would probably have been enough for black-green without another coalition partner.”

“Thank God that didn’t come,” Baum sighs. Joy and applause in the studio!

The journalist’s conclusion: “Everything was completely different when Mr Schäuble, more or less alone, decided to make Mr Laschet a candidate for Chancellor. That’s the only reason we’re sitting here now. “


Believes to have seen through the politics of the FDP: “taz” journalist Ulrike Herrmann

Believes to have seen through the politics of the FDP: “taz” journalist Ulrike Herrmann Photo: ARD

Then the Zoff-o-Meter starts

“Taz” -Herrmann beams himself back into the election campaign: “The FDP program says that one wants to relieve the rich and the entrepreneurs very substantially,” she claims.

Her accusation: “When it comes to giving gifts to the rich, the FDP has absolutely no problem ignoring the black zero!”

“Very polemical!” Complains Baum.

“That may be polemical, but that is the reality of your own program!” Wedges the journalist back.

Due order call

When the audience’s opinions are presented, the group just keeps talking. “I just have to keep the classroom quiet here!” Roars the talk show host. “Now it’s our audience’s turn! They pay fees! They finance the whole event here! Respect, Mr. Scholz would say! “

Most annoying warning

The next ARD clip quotes voices from the negotiation off: “We have an interest in Jamaica! Do you have it too? Do you want it? Do you have the nerve? Are you closed? That is what FDP top politicians are said to have said on Sunday in the explorations with the Union. That’s what BILD wrote this afternoon. “

And further: “The FDP is said to have demanded that the Union must pull the Greens over in tomorrow’s exploratory round, then Jamaica would still be there.”


Put it in a nutshell: Sarna Röser, head of the

Put it in a nutshell: Sarna Röser, head of the “Young Entrepreneurs” group, calls for “Climate protection with the economy, not against it!”Photo: ARD

Bitterest complaint

Then the ARD shows a tweet from the FDP party leader, in which Lindner quotes a complaint by his negotiator Johannes Vogel.

“There were three exploratory talks last week,” explains the FDP member. “From two you read and hear nothing. Alleged content of a conversation to the media is pierced from one. That is noticeable, dear Union – and it sucks! ”

But WELT man Alexander sees it professionally: “That nothing would have come out of the FDP, and of the SPD, they can tell their grandmother that,” he scoffs.

Most dramatic forecast

The last ARD clip quoted mostly negative comments from passers-by about Laschet. The CDU chief himself said that he still believed that he would become chancellor, reports Alexander. Behind this is “a reasonable consideration”.

Because, according to the journalist: “If Laschet were to give up, then an open field battle would begin in the Union. This would mean that they would fail to form a government. But it is important that there are also alternatives! “

Most unpleasant memory

Last time there was a “huge theater” after the failure of Jamaica, the WELT man continues. “The Federal President had to intervene and the SPD

force to form a coalition again! “

Alexander’s assessment: “Now there is an alternative in the middle. The traffic light has the pre because Scholz has more votes. But the CDU has the political responsibility to stand still and say: If you can’t do it, we’ll do it! “

Clearest position descriptions

About possible Laschet successors, the journalist says: Norbert Röttgen stands for really embracing climate protection, targeting the middle and even impressing the left-liberal audience.

“Jens Spahn would say: reinventing the conservative, a clear edge against the red-green mainstream,” adds Alexander. “A bit in the direction of Sebastian Kurz in Austria.”

Most unexpected alternative

And Friedrich Merz? “He’s definitely pissed off when I say that on TV,” explains the journalist, “but he has the idea that Merkel’s 16 years were actually a mistake and that the Union is going back again afterwards.”

Alexander’s astonishing statement: “There are astonishingly many at the base of the CDU who also see it that way.”

Most forgiving closing words

“The people who voted for the CDU wanted Armin Laschet to rule,” explains Baum. “I respect the man. This is an authentic man, he has ethical principles, which I share, and he is an excellent European! “

“He’s one percent less than Scholz,” assists Alexander. “Otherwise Jamaica would be negotiated first. Surely that cannot be the indicator for ‘chancellor’ or ‘very bad political goal’! That annoys me anyway: Anyone who loses an election with us is always made a fool. “

Quote of the evening

“In politics it is incredibly difficult to tell your own people what you have not achieved after a coalition has been formed.”

Gerhart Baum on the planned member survey of the Greens

Conclusion

A lot of sympathetic engagement with the younger ones, a lot of positive serenity with the old wise man and an unusually high amount of entertainment from the journalists, who kept the show going with facial expressions, gestures and body language: That was a talk in the “Interactive Spätschoppen” category.

.
source site