Correspondence Seized in the Case Not Admitted as Evidence

We’ve all come up with the ‘wise’ idea of ​​surreptitiously recording the confession of the defendant in court. However, we know that this will not happen because taking a voice recording without the knowledge of the other party, court not counted as evidence.

A court similar to this issue took place in the past few days, and the question that many people were wondering about law was answered. Come to court, case and details of the precedent decision Let’s take a look together.

Messages seized without permission were not considered as evidence

A man living in Antalya became suspicious of his wife and used a deleted messages recovery application to retrieve the records his wife had deleted. The man whose suspicions were justified, He applied to the court and filed for divorce.

The lawsuit filed by the man in Antalya was rejected by the local court and the man applied to the court of appeal. The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Antalya Regional Court of Justice, which examined the case, stated that the behavior of the woman decided it was a distrust and your man upheld the divorce case. However, the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals, which examined the appeal, rejected the decision.

The reason for the rejection of the decision was the way the man who filed the divorce case got the messages. the other party without consent messages in the divorce case of the man who obtained his private information and used it against him, not counted as evidence.

This is actually a big precedent has been decided. You can now intercept someone’s messages with 3rd party apps and sue them against them. that you cannot use you know. What are you thinking? Please do not forget to share your thoughts with us in the comments.