Apple may cancel Vision Pro because of Huawei!

Apple recently announced its new glasses called Vision Pro. Although the augmented reality glasses stand out with their design and features, they will face a big problem in China. It has been reported that Huawei has owned the rights to the Vision Pro name since 2019 and Apple may have to change this name.

Will Apple get the “Vision Pro” rights from Huawei?

Reports from China indicated that Apple will have some issues with the Vision Pro naming rights. Huawei registered the name “Vision Pro” on May 16, 2019, about four years ago. According to this registration, the Chinese company; has the right to use this name in various products such as photography, cinematographic and LCD TV.

In addition, when documents in China are reviewed, Huawei has licensed the Vision Pro brand until 2031. Even if the company does not have a product in this area, it may prefer the name Vision Pro for virtual reality devices.

The USA prevents Microsoft from buying the maker of Call of Duty!

The USA prevents Microsoft from buying the maker of Call of Duty!

The US government is blocking Microsoft and Activision’s acquisition agreement. Here are the details about why the giant deal was blocked…

However, it is worth noting that Huawei’s trademark registration is not directly related to Apple. The company is currently Vision Glass And Vision SmartScreen It produces two product lines connected with this name, including It seems possible to add the name Vision Pro as a new model to the Vision Smart Screen series.

It is not known how Apple will take a step in this regard. In order not to violate Huawei’s rights, it may sell the Vision Pro under a different name in China. Alternatively, it can contact Huawei to use the Vision Pro brand.

Tim Cook explains why Vision Pro is so expensive

Apple has not announced when the Vision Pro glasses will go on sale. However $3499 It is possible to say that it will have a great impact all over the world with its price.

So what do you think about this subject? Don’t forget to give your opinion in the comments section…

source site-29